Skip to main content
HomeCompareChina vs South Africa › Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)

China vs South Africa: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)

Side-by-side comparison from World Bank Open Data.

In , China's Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e) was -1,346.50, compared to South Africa's -56.71. That makes China's value 2,274.5% lower than South Africa's.

China

Rank #183 of 183 globally

China trend
Latest (2023)
-1,346.50
Year-over-year
+0.0%
10-year change
-27.5%
Peak
-728.67 (2004)
Trough
-1,346.50 (2021)

South Africa

Rank #166 of 183 globally

South Africa trend
Latest (2023)
-56.71
Year-over-year
+0.0%
10-year change
-24.4%
Peak
-10.64 (2018)
Trough
-56.71 (2022)

Other China comparisons

← All China vs South Africa comparisons

Source: World Bank Open Data (EN.GHG.CO2.LU.MT.CE.AR5), CC BY 4.0.