Skip to main content
HomeCompareAustralia vs New Zealand › Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)

Australia vs New Zealand: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)

Side-by-side comparison from World Bank Open Data.

In , Australia's Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e) was -95.82, compared to New Zealand's -20.51. That makes Australia's value 367.2% lower than New Zealand's.

Australia

Rank #171 of 183 globally

Australia trend
Latest (2023)
-95.82
Year-over-year
+8.2%
10-year change
-1,023.8%
Peak
79.39 (2006)
Trough
-108.83 (2021)

New Zealand

Rank #150 of 183 globally

New Zealand trend
Latest (2023)
-20.51
Year-over-year
-4.3%
10-year change
+21.2%
Peak
-19.66 (2022)
Trough
-29.24 (2008)

Other Australia comparisons

← All Australia vs New Zealand comparisons

Source: World Bank Open Data (EN.GHG.CO2.LU.MT.CE.AR5), CC BY 4.0.